RECOMMENDATION
#99-2
Recommendation to Provide Special
Funding to the Fernald Environmental Management Project for Disposition
of Remaining Nuclear Materials
March 16, 1999
Presented to: DOE
Secretary, Ohio Congressional Delegation
Source of Recommendation:
Type of Recommendation:
Requested by: April 15, 1999
The Fernald Citizens
Advisory Board has long been an advocate for the rapid removal of the nuclear
materials still being stored at the Fernald site from its days as an operating
nuclear metals plant. As a Defense Closure site, Fernald is committed to
complete the total remediation of the site by 2006. Fernald no longer has
a mission that is compatible with the safe stewardship of nuclear materials.
Every day these materials continue to be present at the site increases the
duration and cost of remediation and the risk to site workers and nearby
residents.
Since our first
recommendation to expedite removal of this material in 1995, a significant
portion of the Nuclear Materials on site have been disposed through sale.
At long last, a disposition path has been identified for all of the remaining
materials. Recently, 938 metric tons of non-usable materials have been declared
waste, clearing the way for its ultimate disposal. The remaining 3,800 metric
tons of Uranium at Fernald is now under consideration for receipt by the
Oak Ridge Operations Office for storage until final disposition can be achieved.
Removing these materials from the Fernald site is one of the highest priority
issues with local citizens and crucial to the success of site remediation.
The total cost of the disposition of this 4,738 metric tons of Uranium is likely to be in excess of $60 million. This is money that was not included in the sites baseline budget because these materials were not considered part of the Environmental Management program at the site.
At this time, the FCAB is requesting that the U.S. Department of Energy and the US Congress work together to identify this additional funding so that Fernald can make its Defense Closure commitments. If these additional funds are not made available beginning with the FY2000 budget, Fernald will be forced to shift this money from other remediation operations and the ability to achieve site closure by 2006 will certainly be compromised.